Einar Stefferud a �crit:
>
> Unfortunately, I seem to have done something to trigger Mihael Sondow
> into attacking everything I say.
You were making pronouncements about who should be included in the first
DNSO membership. Don't you think that's a pretty bad idea? The AIP-based
proposal won a lot of adherents because, for one thing, it doesn't say who
the members are, or define the constituencies.
What's the good of backsliding and starting up all that fuss again? In the
end, everyone who wants to join is going to be a member, because no one will
ever be able to come up with a good enough argument for keeping them out. So
why make more trouble by saying the membership should be this or that? It
only makes the people who aren't included in the statement angry.
