At 08:41 PM 2/12/99 -0800, you wrote:
>Bill Lovell wrote:
>
>>Perhaps originally, but that is no longer the case. Several decisions have said
>>that NSI had NO duty to carry out TM analyses, and the mere registration of
>>a domain name cannot constitute TM infringement. Consequently, what sorry
>>excuse there ever existed for their having made the policy that they did is now
>>gone.
>
>Actually, I made a similar comment to NSI's general counsel, Philip
>Sbarbaro, in September 1998 at the Stanford WIPO Consultation. I was
>speaking about the ruling in Lockheed v. NSI in re Skunkworks.com, but he
>responded that was only one order in one jurisdiction. In other words,
>NSI's concern about being hauled into court for "contributory infringement"
>remains.
>
>
>Ellen Rony Co-author
>The Domain Name Handbook http://www.domainhandbook.com
>================================ // ===================================
>ISBN 0879305150 *=" ____ / +1 (415) 435-5010
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] \ ) Tiburon, CA
> // \\ "Carpe canine"
> Join the GREY RIBBON CAMPAIGN to bring ICANN out of the shadows.
> See http://www.domainhandbook.com/icannt.html
>
>
>
>
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Don't bother me. I'm living happily ever after.
