Antony, > 3. Consumer-driven e-commerce will only work in chartered TLDs if > there are no unchartered TLDs. In other words, who the hell wants > to be ford.automakers when you can be ford.com, especially when > .automakers is one of thousands of chartered TLDs? I suggest that if the mandate of .com required that *cost of merchanise* had to be stated onsite, much of the pressure would be relieved. For 'enforcement', there is a body of net users who I imagine would be happy to tip off violators. As for *implementation, it seems like an ideal place to use XML. kerry
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Trademarks vs DNS Roeland M.J. Meyer
- [IFWP] Re: Trademarks vs DNS Kerry Miller
- [IFWP] RE: Trademarks vs DNS Roberto Gaetano
- [IFWP] Re: Trademarks vs DNS -Reply -Reply jeff Williams
- [IFWP] Re: Trademarks vs DNS -Reply -Reply William X. Walsh
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Trademarks vs DNS Ellen Rony
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Trademarks vs DNS Ellen Rony
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Trademarks vs DNS jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Trademarks vs DNS Roeland M.J. Meyer
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Trademarks vs DNS Richard J. Sexton
- RE: [IFWP] Re: Trademarks vs DNS Kerry Miller
- RE: [IFWP] Re: Trademarks vs DNS William X. Walsh
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Trademarks vs DNS jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Trademarks vs DNS William X. Walsh
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Trademarks vs DNS jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Trademarks vs DNS William X. Walsh
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Trademarks vs ... Alex Kamantauskas
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Trademarks vs ... jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Trademarks vs DNS Bill Lovell
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Trademarks vs DNS Roeland M.J. Meyer
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Trademarks vs DNS Bill Lovell
