Kent Crispin wrote: > ICANN has very little hold over the ccTLDs; the WIPO process will > probably therefore be only adopted for gTLDs. Ah, so ICANN has already decided, without a membership, without a DNSO, and without even a final WIPO report, that it will adopt the WIPO proposals? When was the deal cut, Esther? Let us know. Or have your PR man give us a ring.... --MM
- [IFWP] Is Nesson right on the objective? And, how do w... Eric Weisberg
- Re: [IFWP] Is Nesson right on the objective? And,... jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Is Nesson right on the objective? And,... Bob Allisat
- Re: [IFWP] Is Nesson right on the objective? And,... Jonathan Zittrain
- [IFWP] Too late, already captured. Bob Allisat
- Re: [IFWP] Is Nesson right on the objective? And,... Milton Mueller
- Re: [IFWP] Is Nesson right on the objective? And,... Michael Dillon
- Re: [IFWP] Is Nesson right on the objective? ... Kent Crispin
- Re: [IFWP] Is Nesson right on the objecti... Milton Mueller
- Re: [IFWP] Is Nesson right on the obj... Kent Crispin
- Re: [IFWP] Is Nesson right on th... Milton Mueller
- Re: [IFWP] Is Nesson right on th... Dr Eberhard W Lisse
