Stef,
You wrote:
> I apologize Kilnam for jumping to the same conclusion that Joop came
> to -- That selective notification of a pulic meeting was hapening yet
> again!
>
> So, as you see, it is much more reasonable when posting this kind of
> message to visibly cross post it to avoid causing people to suspect
> ill will.
>
Let me disagree.
I personally hate cross-posting, and will avoid doing it (and recommend
others to do the same).
Of course, people are free to suspect what they want, and the attitude of
jumping to conclusions without knowing all the facts will not be eliminated
by increasing the mess by cross posting.
Hint: I am replying to all lists included in your message (I consider polite
to address the reply to all those who were addressed originally, and this
overrides my dislike of cross-posting), but the fact that you see
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" as addressee does not mean that this list will
receive the message, because I am not subscribed to it.
So, people who like to suspect will continue to suspect even with
cross-posting ;>)
Roberto
P.S.: BTW, I am not at all convinced that being suspicious is a bad thing.
Suspicious people provide better double-check that all rules are applied,
and therefore a good service to the community ;>)
