Chuck Gomes wrote:
+ There was nothing under the table. There was nothing
+ unethical. They were contributors to the process who did
+ not have funding. The fact that they were not quite so one
+ sided in their views as you is another issue.
I, Bob Allisat, replied:
> Okay. Next ICANN meeting somewhere on Earth you
> good folks pay for my air fare. I seem to be a
> contributor to the process who most definately
> does not have funding. And my views are not so
> one sided as many. How 'bout it.
William Walsh commented:
= Your views are not so one sided?
=
= ROFL
=
= That's a good one Bob.
Thank you. I don't think we have ever met in
person. Nor have I met any of the various and
sundry parties to this debate. I would like to
have that opportunity one day. And to perhaps
demonstrate that a lifetime of work with many
people in often highly stressful and problematic
situations can indeed combine with strongly held
views and a profound commitment to consensual
decision making. Awaiting eventual funding.
Bob Allisat
Free Community Network _ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://fcn.net _ http://fcn.net/allisat
http://robin.fcn.net
