OK Kent -- I have laid out all my support for other sources.

There was then and is now, nothing going on under the table on my side
of this discussion.  I and ORSC specialize in working in the open, and
I must say that I find that we have been able to contribute vastly
more to the cause of finding consensus with out open melding and
merging processes than your scretive efforts to manipulate DNSO.ORG
into a closed deal with INTA/WIPO.  But time will tell.

BTW, ORSC was directly involved with watering down the contributions
of NSI to the PARIS draft.  But how woudl you know this, when you
refuse to heed anything we contribute.

Now, lets see an honest listing of your support sources.

Also note that there was absolutely no discussion between NIS and ORSC
or myself on the issue that you love to hate (private control of
TLDs).  Quite frankly, I take the White Paper to make clear that such
private ownership in an open free competitive market is a given,
regardless of your total opposition to the mere idea of it.

So, now we finally see what your real down deep motivation is -- Namely
to do whatever you can to destroy the idea, and destroy the work of
others who disagree with your on this point.

Thank you for finally making your ICANN cartel based anticompetition
position crystal clear;-)...

And I await your clear statement of all sources of support.

Cheers...\Stef

>From your message Thu, 25 Feb 1999 11:28:26 -0800:
}
}On Thu, Feb 25, 1999 at 12:14:40PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
}> Kent,
}> 
}> Is your definition of an antagonist one who does not support ICANN?
}
}The precise definition of "antagonist" is completely unimportant. 
}The real issue is that NSI, a government contractor, has funded
}participation of other parties who support a key NSI position
}(private control of TLDs).  
}
}Given that the activity under discussion has direct relevance to DOC
}oversight of NSI, and that NSI is a government contractor, I think
}these under the table payments by NSI are quite significant.  And
}they certainly give an insight into the ethics of the NSI management. 
}
}-- 
}Kent Crispin, PAB Chair                                "Do good, and you'll be
}[EMAIL PROTECTED]                              lonesome." -- Mark Twain

Reply via email to