Stef said: I think it woudl be just fine if you, Kent, would stop putting words
>my my mouth, and trying to speak for ORSC;-)...
>
>First, I assure you that this is not a joke;-)...
>
>I in fact am seriously opposed to a lot of NSI policies and I am
>working toward moving to a different TLD, in part to be free of the
>threats posed by the NSI TM policy.
>
>But, if ICANN has its way, things will become much worse for all DNS
>name registrants at all fee based registration levels when the
>Registrara has the power to removed registered names without hearing
>for a variety of "causes". ICANN threatens to destabilize all
>businesses that depend on stable DNS name arrangements.
>
[snip]
1. Question to ICANN: who wrote the draft guidelines for registrars???
Or would announcing this simple fact be too destabilizing to the interests
of the GIP? IBM, MCI, etc.
2. who will be first to sue ICANN? I think the announcement of suit will
be made soon. I nominate who ever moves first to sue ICANN receive this
years EFF pioneer award and expect that esther will recuse herself from the
debate on that decision.
***************************************************************************
The COOK Report on Internet 431 Greenway Ave, Ewing, NJ 08618 USA
(609) 882-2572 (phone & fax) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.cookreport.com
NOTE: Contempt in which ICANN PRES. MIKE ROBERTS holds rest of Internet:
"Some of those people think the management [ICANN] should check with the
public [the Communities of the Internet] every time they make a decision,
which is crazy," Roberts said. "That's flat-out crazy." WIRED NEWS 2/4/99
***************************************************************************
