At 12:14 PM 2/25/99 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Is your definition of an antagonist one who does not support ICANN? Should
>we all just blindly accept everything that ICANN proposes, without careful
>analysis and evaluation? I really doubt that you feel that way.
Chuck,
Since you typically try to offered reasoned and reasonable notes and since
is the second note you have posted to this thread using hostile, ad
absurdum statements, let me suggest that you are either reacting rather too
defensively or you are consciously trying to distract us from serious
consideration of my statement.
NSI chose to fund people who are vigorous opponents to proposals on the
table. Kent listed some names; there are more. Rather than just attack
anyone who points out this selective behavior by NSI, how about explaining
the exact decision process that led to NSI's giving money to some activists
and not others. NSI did not make public that it would offering funding, so
there was opportunity for others to seek that assistance.
So why did those who got money get it and others not?
d/
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Dave Crocker Tel: +1 408 246 8253
Brandenburg Consulting Fax: +1 408 273 6464
675 Spruce Drive <http://www.brandenburg.com>
Sunnyvale, CA 94086 USA <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
