Fred and all,
Fred Baker wrote:
> At 02:48 AM 2/27/99 +0000, jeff Williams wrote:
> >>Until the PSO is set up, that leaves them with the IETF, it
> >>doesn't automagically move them somewhere that they have never been.
> >
> > I would say that your conclusion here is questionable. We may submit
> >our own PSO proposal, or someone else may. I could even be imagined
> >given the current actions of the ICANN Board, that the ICANN itself may set
> >put forth it's own PSO proposal.
>
> I'm not certain how the two statements correlate. There are a number of
> possibilities about how the PSO might be formed, and what might happen
> after it is. I'm not sure how that relates to the present reality that
> protocol numbers have been assigned by IANA on behalf of the IETF?
There is no DIRECT correlation of course. However there is an
indirect correlation in that the current reality, is and should change,
hence my comment.
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Contact Number: 972-447-1894
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
