Karl Auerbach wrote: > What is bothering me is the question of who has the ultimate authority to > say "no" to a standards body (the IETF being one) that wants a number for > a standard protocol? > I suspect that this won't often be a problem, but it could happen in some > of those tight spaces, like the IP protocol number. Speaking of which, the assigned number decimal 8 for the IP protocol does not seem to match what is getting "press" for IPv8 these days. At least, what is being called IPv8 today does not match what I had understood the P Internet Protocol to be. --gregbo
- [IFWP] Re: fyi - an exchange of mail with ICANN jeff Williams
- [IFWP] Re: fyi - an exchange of mail with ICANN Karl Auerbach
- [IFWP] Re: fyi - an exchange of mail with ICANN Karl Auerbach
- [IFWP] Re: fyi - an exchange of mail with ICANN Karl Auerbach
- [IFWP] Re: fyi - an exchange of mail with ICANN jeff Williams
- [IFWP] Re: fyi - an exchange of mail with ICANN jeff Williams
- [IFWP] Re: fyi - an exchange of mail with ICANN jeff Williams
- [IFWP] Re: fyi - an exchange of mail with ICANN jeff Williams
- [IFWP] Re: fyi - an exchange of mail with ICANN Karl Auerbach
- Re: [IFWP] Re: fyi - an exchange of mail with ICANN Greg Skinner
- Re: [IFWP] Re: fyi - an exchange of mail with ICANN Richard J. Sexton
