Look at /etc/services port 666 and compare with IANA's table.
Same deal.
At 11:52 AM 3/2/99 -0800, Greg Skinner wrote:
>Karl Auerbach wrote:
>
>> What is bothering me is the question of who has the ultimate authority to
>> say "no" to a standards body (the IETF being one) that wants a number for
>> a standard protocol?
>
>> I suspect that this won't often be a problem, but it could happen in some
>> of those tight spaces, like the IP protocol number.
>
>Speaking of which, the assigned number decimal 8 for the IP protocol does
>not seem to match what is getting "press" for IPv8 these days. At least,
>what is being called IPv8 today does not match what I had understood
>the P Internet Protocol to be.
>
>--gregbo
>
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Those who give up a little freedom for a little security
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one"
--Thomas Jefferson
