Franky and all,
Good points Franky!! Precisely one of many many points that is
substantial to the fact that a structured "Constituency" within the
framework of a set of bylaws dealing with a "Public Trust" is
yet another form of gerrymandering and therefore divisive. It therefore
cannot continue unabated and at the same time provide for "Stability"
within any SO structure or as a part of ICANN...
Therefore it is simply, and without doubt, concluded, that the saga
of divisiveness continues as long as a "Structured Constituency"
remains..... As the emperors of Rome would say, let the games
begin.....
Frank Rizzo wrote:
> At 8:46 AM -0800 3/18/99, jeff Williams wrote:
> >John and all,
> >
> > Well suppose the Domain is registered to an individual, but is owned
> >by an organization that is commercial or non-commercial? Which
> >constituency(s) would that situation fit into?
> >
> >And the saga of divisiveness continues....
>
> Suppose it was a 2nd level commercial domain of a non-comercial (FCN or
> Monolith) ISP, but owned by a Limited Partnership? What if that domain was
> deleted for non-payment? Would they talk to FCN, or ICANN, the Nozzle, or
> CORE? What is Esther is unavailable due to a religious emergency?
>
> I think we can see from the many examples sited that the best solution is
> to leave Nozzle (NSOL) is charge of their monopoly.
>
> And the saga of divisiveness continues....
>
> -Ri
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Contact Number: 972-447-1894
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
