Re: [IFWP] Re: [bwg-n-friends] Re: Bay Area meeting with Esther

[Bill Lovell]

*At 09:11 PM 3/19/99 +0000, you wrote:
>William and all,
>
>  True enough.  However by the same token it doesn't mean that the
>appeal won't either.  Hence the reason for a court of appeals, william.
>In addition if there is more discovery, which is likely in this particular
>case there is a whole new case potentially.
>
There is no new discovery on an appeal.  What is "appealed" is the
case as it left the District Court. Only on remand from the appellate
court would there be any opportunity for new discovery.

Bill Lovell