William and all,
William X. Walsh wrote:
> I don't think PGMedia is a credible plaintiff, Jeff. I know you do (no
> surprise there in light of, well, that subject is for another time).
I think the fact that pgMedia had the both the guts to bring the case
in part, stands for itself as to their creditability an sincerity with respect
to fairness, and doing the right thing. This cannot be said for IOD
as of yet not for that matter for Iperdom. It would be best as I posted
earlier on this thread if all of them would work together in bringing a
legal case here.
>
>
> A more credible plaintiff will have more support and be able to make a more
> convincing and compelling case.
I thought that their case was quite compelling, a judge say it differently.
This however has only some effect on the case itself when the appeal is
heard and more discovery is complete as Paul has already given us a
peek at and anticipates.
> And the appropriate defendent is not NSI,
> Jeff, as PGMedia insists. They are going about it all wrong.
I agree in part here. It is acctually more of a case that the IANA
is the more proper defendant. However there is a separate case
still pending from pgMedia against the IANA.
>
>
> On 19-Mar-99 jeff Williams wrote:
> > William and all,
> >
> > True enough. However by the same token it doesn't mean that the
> > appeal won't either. Hence the reason for a court of appeals, william.
> > In addition if there is more discovery, which is likely in this particular
> > case there is a whole new case potentially.
> >
> > William X. Walsh wrote:
> >
> > > Doesn't mean the appeal has any more merit than the original case did.
> > >
> > > On 19-Mar-99 jeff Williams wrote:
> > > > Gordon and all,
> > > >
> > > > As you know, pgMedia has filed an appeal.. So there is still an
> > > > agrieved party.
> > > >
> > > > Gordon Cook wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Someone asked: Why was NSI granted a two year extension to the
> > > > > Cooperative Agreement without an open re-bid? The end of the
> > > > > Cooperative
> > > > > Agreement wasn't something that just snuck up and bit NTIA in the
> > > > > bottom
> > > > > and said "surprise!".
> > > > >
> > > > > Cook: NTIA wanted to rebid.
> > > > >
> > > > > NSF saw no need to rebid...... It *WAS* NSF's agreement. therefore
> > > > > nothing
> > > > > NTIA could do about it. By the time NTIA pryed it away from NSF, it
> > > > > was
> > > > > abit late.
> > > > >
> > > > > NTIA has not a shred of legally defensible authority to be doing what
> > > > > it is
> > > > > doing. I have triple sourced this. But to challenge NTIA now you need
> > > > > a
> > > > > legally agrieved party. With the PGMedia case now history we don't
> > > > > presently have a legally aggrieved party. Damned shame. because NTIA
> > > > > will
> > > > > soon give ICANN the root and with the DNSO people calling all over
> > > > > themselves to get ICANN to comply to their way of thinking they are
> > > > > de-facto accepting ICANN legal authority and ensnaring themselves in
> > > > > ICANN's clutches.
> > > > >
> > > > > we need an IODesign lawsuit. It cannot possibly happen too fast.
> > > > >
> > > > > ************************************************************************
> > > > > ***
> > > > > The COOK Report on Internet | New handbook just published:IP
> > > > > Insur-
> > > > > 431 Greenway Ave, Ewing, NJ 08618 USA| gency & Transformation of
> > > > > Telecomm.See
> > > > > (609) 882-2572 (phone & fax) |
> > > > > http://cookreport.com/insurgency.html
> > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Index to 7 years of COOK Report,
> > > > > how
> > > > > to
> > > > > subscribe, exec summaries, special reports, gloss at
> > > > > http://www.cookreport.com
> > > > > ************************************************************************
> > > > > ****
> > > > > **
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Jeffrey A. Williams
> > > > CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
> > > > Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
> > > > E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Contact Number: 972-447-1894
> > > > Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
> > >
> > > ----------------------------------
> > > E-Mail: William X. Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Date: 19-Mar-99
> > > Time: 18:45:55
> > > ----------------------------------
> > > "We may well be on our way to a society overrun by hordes
> > > of lawyers, hungry as locusts."
> > > - Chief Justice Warren Burger, US Supreme Court, 1977
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > --
> > Jeffrey A. Williams
> > CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
> > Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
> > E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Contact Number: 972-447-1894
> > Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
>
> ----------------------------------
> E-Mail: William X. Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 19-Mar-99
> Time: 19:56:18
> ----------------------------------
> "We may well be on our way to a society overrun by hordes
> of lawyers, hungry as locusts."
> - Chief Justice Warren Burger, US Supreme Court, 1977
>
>
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Contact Number: 972-447-1894
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
