On Tue, Jan 12, 1999 at 02:36:04PM -0500, Martin B. Schwimmer wrote:
> What would be examples of entities or individuals who would fall under the
> At Large constituency?
Me/Songbird(r), any freelance web developer/internet consultant, eg
Dave Crocker.
San Francisco Bay Area chapter of ISOC
A private attorney who didn't want to spend the money to be, or
didn't feel they fit, in one of the other constituencies -- eg, a
trademark attorney that didn't want to be part of the TM
constituency. Concretely, maybe Brett Fausett.
An ISP in a developing country that didn't want to spend the money
necessary to be a member of the normal "presence provider"
constituency.
Interested individuals -- Elen Rony. Karl Auerbach. Dan Steinberg.
Marty Schwimmer. Dave Farber. Joop Teernstra. Milton Mueller.
Patrick Greenwell.
A domain name pirate.
A website owner with a virtual domain who has been impacted by a
domain name pirate.
An individual fed up with harvesting of email addresses in whois
records, or otherwise concerned with privacy matters associated with DNS.
A person with a point of view on dispute resolution that they don't
see reflected in another constituency.
I could probably go on for some time. Basically, any entity that didn't
feel their interests were represented in another constituency. Note
that the operative definition is what *they* think about the matter,
not what the definitions of the constituencies are.
--
Kent Crispin, PAB Chair "Do good, and you'll be
[EMAIL PROTECTED] lonesome." -- Mark Twain
__________________________________________________
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___END____________________________________________
