Kent Crispin wrote:
>A private attorney who didn't want to spend the money to be, or
>didn't feel they fit, in one of the other constituencies -- eg, a
>trademark attorney that didn't want to be part of the TM
>constituency. Concretely, maybe Bret Fausett.
Actually, I think the "trademark lawyers who don't want to be a
part of the trademark constituency" should be their own constituency.
I suggest that the new allocation on the Names Council be as follows:
1.� Registries - 3
2.� Registrars - 3
3.� Infrastructure and connectivity providers - 3
4.� Business and other organizations -3
5.� Organizations primarily concerned with
the interests of trademark owners - 3
6. Trademark lawyers who don't want to be
a part of the trademark constituency - 3
7.� At Large - 3
This puts this noble new category on the same footing as
the Registries. The previous 6 registry reps was just too many.
-- Bret
__________________________________________________
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___END____________________________________________
