At 00:01 13/01/99 -0800, you wrote:
>
>> Look at the DNSO propsal a la ORSC
>> <http://www.dnso.net/library/dnso-orsc.proposal.shtml>
>> 
>> To whit:
>> 
>> >The Domain Name Supporting Organization (DNSO) shall be composed of any 
>> >individual, firm, association, corporation or other entity who is the 
>> >holder of a second level domain (SLD) in any top level domain (TLD)
>> (Hereinafter "Domain 
>> >Name Holder").
>
>I'd suggest amending that to be ... "holder of one or more second level
>domain(s) (SLD)..."
>
>Then I'd further add that they get one and exactly one vote.
>
>And I'd add a membership audit committee that went around and looked into
>questionable cases (their call as to what constitutes "questionable") to
>see if somebody is creating shell entities.
>

And let's not forget the holders of  third level domains in cases where
ccTLD's control the second level.  (co.uk, co.nz , com.au,  etc.)
See my submitted amendment.



--Joop--
http://www.democracy.org.nz/ 

__________________________________________________
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___END____________________________________________

Reply via email to