On Wed, 13 Jan 1999, Karl Auerbach wrote:
>
> I'd suggest amending that to be ... "holder of one or more second level
> domain(s) (SLD)..."
>
Point of clarification - who will be considered the 'holder' of an SLD?
> Then I'd further add that they get one and exactly one vote.
>
I agree - there is no reason why TabNet should have more voting
privelegest than, say, myself.
> And I'd add a membership audit committee that went around and looked into
> questionable cases (their call as to what constitutes "questionable") to
> see if somebody is creating shell entities.
>
> --karl--
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> To receive the digest version instead, send a
> blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ___END____________________________________________
>
--
Alex Kamantauskas
Tugger Networks
__________________________________________________
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___END____________________________________________
