>Negative. The ICANN's role, and the DNSO's role, with regard to ccTLDs
must
>be minimal. Their object should not be to remove ccTLDs, especially on the
>basis of as-yet undefined criteria, nor should it have any say in how they
>are managed or developed or assigned, except within the limits of a basic
>contract with ICANN for use of the root. ccTLDs and gTLDs should and must
>be treated separately. This will be a show-stopper for most ccTLDs.
So what you're saying is that ICANN takes on IANA's role WRT gTLDs, but
not WRT ccTLDs?
Smacks of, "Do anything you want, but leave me alone!"
All or nothing - either ICANN has control of the roots, or it doesn't.
Nobody
gets treated unfairly or under different terms.
This will be a show-stopper for most gTLDs.
--
Christopher Ambler
This email address belongs to a Resident of the State of Washington
__________________________________________________
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___END____________________________________________
