> IANA always treated ccTLDs differently from gTLDs. Specifically, IANA
> assumed that it had the power to create IAHC to devise a new policy
> regarding gTLDs. It was very clear at all times that IANA understood
> that it had no power over ccTLDs. Postel chose, very wisely, to adopt
> a policy of deference to the relevant sovereign government.
When Jon Postel asked me to serve on the IAHC[*] he made no such statement
nor imposed any such limitation.
--karl--
[*] I didn't serve on the committee due to time constraints.
__________________________________________________
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___END____________________________________________
- [ifwp] Re: Commentary on ICC submission Christopher Ambler
- [ifwp] Re: Commentary on ICC submission Jim Dixon
- [ifwp] Re: Commentary on ICC submission Christopher Ambler
- [ifwp] Re: Commentary on ICC submission Kent Crispin
- [ifwp] RE: Commentary on ICC submission Antony Van Couvering
- [ifwp] Re: Commentary on ICC submission Christopher Ambler
- [ifwp] Re: Commentary on ICC submission Karl Auerbach
- [ifwp] Re: Commentary on ICC submission William X. Walsh
- [ifwp] Re: Commentary on ICC submission William X. Walsh
- [ifwp] Re: Commentary on ICC submission Oscar A. Robles Garay
- [ifwp] Re: Commentary on ICC submission Christopher Ambler
- [ifwp] Re: Commentary on ICC submission William X. Walsh
- [ifwp] Re: Commentary on ICC submission Christopher Ambler
- [ifwp] Re: Commentary on ICC submission Kent Crispin
- [ifwp] Re: Commentary on ICC submission Kent Crispin
- [ifwp] Re: Commentary on ICC submission Milton Mueller
- [ifwp] RE: Commentary on ICC submission Milton Mueller
