On Fri, 15 Jan 1999, Christopher Ambler wrote:
> And what of the ccTLDs that are not run by the governments? What of those
> who are operated out-of-country? What of those who are operated without
> the oversight (and perhaps even the knowledge) of the government in
> question?
This is only matter of the stakeholders. If the primary clients/users/ISPs/customers
of this ccTLD are happy with that, what does it matter?
Governments are good in *some* countries when they decide about technology issues. If
they are not aware about their ccTLD, they don't need it.
>
> Just asking...
>
> --
> Christopher Ambler
> This email address belongs to a Resident of the State of Washington
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Antony Van Couvering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Christopher Ambler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> DNSO Mail List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, January 15, 1999 2:16 PM
> Subject: RE: Commentary on ICC submission
>
>
> >I say this as a matter of practicality. Are you seriously going to tell
> the
> >Chinese how run .CN? If you attempt it, you will see the Chinese interfere
> >at governmental levels, making the meddling of the U.S. and European
> >governments seem trivial by comparison.
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> To receive the digest version instead, send a
> blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ___END____________________________________________
>
>
__________________________________________________
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___END____________________________________________
