-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Brad,

Individuals will certainly be welcome associates within the TLDA
organization.  Sorry, I cannot address the policy of any of the other
constituancies.

Gene Marsh

- -----Original Message-----
From: Bret A. Fausett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 29, 1999 2:59 PM
To: IFWP
Subject: [IFWP] "...for which they qualify"


ICANN's "Domain Name Supporting Organization Formation Concepts" 
Statement contains a provision which reads: "Individual domain name 
holders should be able to participate in constituencies for which they

qualify."

Depending on the decisions ICANN makes in approving competing 
constituency applications, individual domain name holders may be
present 
in *none* of the seven original constituencies. There is at least one 
proposal in each of the seven constituency areas (including, oddly 
enough, the Non-Commercial Domain Name Holder category) that adopts an

organizations-centric model in which individuals either do not qualify
or 
are placed in a minority position.

I had the impression following the Singapore meeting that ICANN had
sent 
a clear message that individual domain name holders were important 
stakeholders in this process and should be included in certain of the 
DNSO's constituency activities. I certainly didn't read "...for which 
they qualify" as an invitation to draft exclusive constituency
proposals. 
 Was I mistaken?

       -- Bret

For reference, ICANN's "DNSO Formation Concepts" is at:
http://www.icann.org/dnso-formation.html

Links to current constituency drafts are at:
http://www.icann.org/dnso/constituency_groups.html

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Personal Privacy 6.0.2

iQA/AwUBNyiv35HtPfG6xLnPEQKFoACeNHbehsj3FmSxgnhs37roMn8T5FYAnjPJ
2qE0lxBTsdssTgUtvifsugcs
=Plgi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to