Tony, In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "A.M. Rutkowski" writes: > Steinar, > > >There is a real, *technical* need to be able to get hold of domain > >contact persons. The info needed to do this sometimes includes phone/ > >fax number and street address - email isn't always enough. > > > RFC1183 provides a nice way to do this with RP and > associated TXT resources. However, it's not apparent > whether this is supported or used. That may change > significantly with the Digital Millennium Act. There is even a record type for longitude/latitude. But, it's not *REQUIRED*. And, some earlier bind implementations choke nicely on that. If I am not mistaken Microsnot's garbage has problems too. el
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI William X. Walsh
- RE: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI Dave Crocker
- RE: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI cgomes
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI William X. Walsh
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI Martin B. Schwimmer
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI A.M. Rutkowski
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI Karl Auerbach
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI sthaug
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI A.M. Rutkowski
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI Kent Crispin
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI Karl Auerbach
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI Karl Auerbach
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI A.M. Rutkowski
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI Jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI Patrick Greenwell
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI A.M. Rutkowski
