Patrick Greenwell a �crit: > > On Tue, 18 May 1999, Bill Lovell wrote: > > > The US District Court for the District of Columbia agreed that it > > was a tax but said that Congress could retroactively authorize it, > > which lawmakers did later that month. > > This most of all, is particularly appalling.... There is a burgeoning lawlessness in this country which has infected even the federal government. Twenty years this ruling would not have been made.
- [IFWP] The "Tax" and how to spend the $62 mill... Bill Lovell
- Re: [IFWP] The "Tax" and how to spend the... Patrick Greenwell
- Re: [IFWP] The "Tax" and how to spend... Bill Lovell
- Re: [IFWP] The "Tax" and how to s... Michael Sondow
- Re: [IFWP] The "Tax" and how to spend... Michael Sondow
- Re: [IFWP] The "Tax" and how to spend... Dan Steinberg
- Re: [IFWP] The "Tax" and how to s... Patrick Greenwell
- Re: [IFWP] The "Tax" and how ... Dave Farber
- Re: [IFWP] The "Tax" and how ... Dan Steinberg
- Re: [IFWP] The "Tax" and how to spend the... Richard J. Sexton
- Re: [IFWP] The "Tax" and how to spend the... Gordon Cook
