At 09:55 AM 5/29/99 -0400, you wrote:
>Gene,
>
>The Berlin meeting was the first time that the
>comments/scribing/webcast/meeting archive tools really reached critical
>mass. It had been available in Singapore and Cambridge, too, but novelty
>and time zones may have made it less accessible to remote listeners, and we
>only had scribing and audiocasting (I think) down at IFWP Geneva last
>summer. I didn't detect any aversion to remote comments by the chair in
>Berlin--certainly not based on the content of the messages--just a sense of
>overload as in-room and extra-room comments piled up on each agenda item.
Yeah, it worked very well on the first day but the remote participants
sort got the shot end of the time straw on the second day. We need
to take them seriously and *respond* to their questions and comments.
>I'd love to see the tools brought to "3.0" through brainstorming on this
>list, and then integrated more tightly with the Santiago meeting
>proceedings. ...JZ
I can't think what I'd add at this juncture. Do you have any ideas ?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Remember, amateurs built the Ark. Professionals built the Titanic.
