Re: [IFWP] Today's ICANN's Berlin Meeting (Wedesday)

[Diane Cabell]

I seem to remember a few being posted on the screen while being read aloud
during the morning session, but I was working on MAC documents and not able to
pay keen attention. They read Bret's question about ICANN legal fees.  In the
afternoon, the speakers who were physically present had a hard time keeping
their remarks brief.  It appeared quite frustrating for everyone.  Too much to
say, too little time.

Many of these people spoke multiple times and were the same folks who have
attended most of the previous meetings.  Do you think a one-comment-per-speaker
rule would have been inappropriate?

Diane Cabell
http://www.mama-tech.com
Fausett, Gaeta & Lund, LLP
Boston, MA

Richard J. Sexton wrote:

> I tired my best. You'll note that about 4:12 pm on wednesday I asked her
> to read them and she wouldnt. I don't think "having the scribes
> prepare summaries of the remote comments" counts as "remote participation".
>
> At 09:58 PM 5/27/99 -0400, you wrote:
> >Diane C wrote:
> >
> >>I forgot to mention that the comments that come in from people listening
> >>to the
> >>webcasts are also read to the assembly.
> >