Diane and all,
The real problem which you eluded to with these ICANN meetings is poor
planning in as much as not enough time allotted for each meeting.
Diane Cabell wrote:
> I seem to remember a few being posted on the screen while being read aloud
> during the morning session, but I was working on MAC documents and not able to
> pay keen attention. They read Bret's question about ICANN legal fees. In the
> afternoon, the speakers who were physically present had a hard time keeping
> their remarks brief. It appeared quite frustrating for everyone. Too much to
> say, too little time.
>
> Many of these people spoke multiple times and were the same folks who have
> attended most of the previous meetings. Do you think a one-comment-per-speaker
> rule would have been inappropriate?
>
> Diane Cabell
> http://www.mama-tech.com
> Fausett, Gaeta & Lund, LLP
> Boston, MA
>
> Richard J. Sexton wrote:
>
> > I tired my best. You'll note that about 4:12 pm on wednesday I asked her
> > to read them and she wouldnt. I don't think "having the scribes
> > prepare summaries of the remote comments" counts as "remote participation".
> >
> > At 09:58 PM 5/27/99 -0400, you wrote:
> > >Diane C wrote:
> > >
> > >>I forgot to mention that the comments that come in from people listening
> > >>to the
> > >>webcasts are also read to the assembly.
> > >
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Contact Number: 972-447-1894
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
