>The Sondow plan however is flawed at its most basic levels in being
>overly exclusive. even though the so called justification for it is
>important. By going so far in its exclusions, it simply cannot meet
>the mandate it is seeking to fill.
>
>It has numerous other flaws as well.
>
>The ACM plan was a move in the right direction, without compromising
>too much on the "non-commercial" principles.
>
>Not to mention that Mr Sondow has ..... shall we say alienated a
>number of people who would be participants in such a constituency.
>The proposals might garner more support if both him and Don Heath
>agreed not to serve in leadership roles of this constituency.
No question Michael has pissed a lot of people off. I prefer to
address the substance, not the tone of the arguments however.
Both Mueller and Sondow made a lot of concessions in the NC meeting.
The only thing they wouldn't conceded is that Heaths 30 supporting
organizations should elect the 3 names council memebrs.
It would beoove Sondow a this point to draft a new position paper
where ICIIU stands, as it's changed.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Remember, amateurs built the Ark. Professionals built the Titanic.
