On Sun, 30 May 1999 12:19:07 -0400 (EDT), "Richard J. Sexton"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>The Sondow plan however is flawed at its most basic levels in being
>>overly exclusive. even though the so called justification for it is
>>important. By going so far in its exclusions, it simply cannot meet
>>the mandate it is seeking to fill.
>>
>>It has numerous other flaws as well.
>>
>>The ACM plan was a move in the right direction, without compromising
>>too much on the "non-commercial" principles.
>>
>>Not to mention that Mr Sondow has ..... shall we say alienated a
>>number of people who would be participants in such a constituency.
>>The proposals might garner more support if both him and Don Heath
>>agreed not to serve in leadership roles of this constituency.
>
>No question Michael has pissed a lot of people off. I prefer to
>address the substance, not the tone of the arguments however.
>
>Both Mueller and Sondow made a lot of concessions in the NC meeting.
>
>The only thing they wouldn't conceded is that Heaths 30 supporting
>organizations should elect the 3 names council memebrs.
Well, you know how I stand on the ISOC. :)
Don Heath has pissed a lot of people off as well.
I would like to see someone else come forward with a credible claim
and a strong personality and be a productive compromise leader for
this constituency. Someone who has earned the respect of all the
participants here.
I have someone who comes to mind, but I doubt she would be interested
:)
--
William X. Walsh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
General Manager, DSo Internet Services
Fax:(209) 671-7934
