So BTW the job is on the road with first the test bed registrar, this will
open the competition at the registrars level and secondly the DNSO will
draft recommendations to the ICANN board on how to put in place new
registries. So we are on the way.
Jean-Michel B�car
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.etsi.org
E.T.S.I. FAS Systems Project Manager
Tel: +(33) (0)4 92 94 43 15
Fax: +(33) (0)4 92 38 52 15
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gene Marsh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, July 04, 1999 20:31
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [IFWP] Re: Thoughts on ICANN
>
>
> Hi Greg Skinner, you wrote on 7/4/99 12:27:21 PM:
>
> >Since a lot of this seems (at times) to be an ICANN vs. NSI
> power struggle,
> >I think it's unfortunate that instead of trying to set up
> ICANN as some
> >kind of "government," the NTIA/DoC didn't just try to set up
> a competitive
> >registrar system for .com, .net, and .org directly. It
> could have been
> >conducted openly, with RFCs and other opportunities for
> public comment.
> >Also, we would have all known who was responsible for making
> the decisions
> >and what their authority was.
> >
> >--gregbo
> >
>
> Greg,
>
> Agreed, or even better, a coordinating entity that examines,
> discusses and
> recommends competitive root and registry systems. It's like
> having 10
> million square miles of open land, and fighting over one square block.
>
> Gene...
>
> +++++++++++++++++++++
> I'm very happy @.HOME(sm)
> Gene Marsh
> president, anycastNET Incorporated
>
