"Richard J. Sexton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> However, I agree with the original statement if it was >> intended to convey that the idea was that if you registered a domain name >> [...] that you were establishing a reference to some set of network resources >> associated with the name. > Not really. It's entirely feasible to have a domain with only > TXT rr's, no A or MX rr's; in other words, no. OK, I will modify my statement to be that it was established to provide mappings between names and generic resources (which might not be traditionally thought of as network resources). However the intent was to provide a reference to something else that someone might use. Cybersquatters wish only to resell the domain name. I'm not badmouthing them; just pointing out that the intent of their registrations is different than what was traditionally done. --gregbo
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Anti-cybersquatting (Trademark Owners) Pr... Greg Skinner
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Anti-cybersquatting (Trademark Owner... Richard J. Sexton
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Anti-cybersquatting (Trademark Owner... Greg Skinner
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Anti-cybersquatting (Trademark O... William X. Walsh
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Anti-cybersquatting (Trademark Owner... Richard J. Sexton
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Anti-cybersquatting (Trademark Owner... Richard J. Sexton
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Anti-cybersquatting (Trademark O... Mark Measday
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Anti-cybersquatting (Trademark Owner... Greg Skinner
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Anti-cybersquatting (Trademark O... Jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Anti-cybersquatting (Trademark O... Diane Cabell
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Anti-cybersquatting (Tradema... William X. Walsh
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Anti-cybersquatting (Trademark Owner... Greg Skinner
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Anti-cybersquatting (Trademark O... William X. Walsh
