At 06:00 PM 17/07/1999 -0700, Kent Crispin wrote: > >It's not a legitimate constituency, in my opinion, and in the >opinion of quite a few others. No other constituency flashes up a >little "loyalty oath" when you try to join. > No other constituency is meeting so much resistance and obstruction in finding recognition either. Do not confuse cause and effect, Kent. The other constituencies do not allow individuals period, so they have no need for the individual approach. --Joop Teernstra LL.M.-- , bootstrap of the Cyberspace Association, the constituency for Individual Domain Name Owners http://www.idno.org
- Re: [IDNO-DISCUSS] Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpose Kent Crispin
- Re: [IDNO-DISCUSS] Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpos... Mark C. Langston
- Re: [IDNO-DISCUSS] Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpos... Jeff Williams
- Re: [IDNO-DISCUSS] Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpos... Kent Crispin
- Re[2]: [IDNO-DISCUSS] Re: [IFWP] Why fail on... William X. Walsh
- Re: [IDNO-DISCUSS] Re: [IFWP] Why fail o... Jeff Williams
- Re: Re[2]: [IDNO-DISCUSS] Re: [IFWP] Why... Kent Crispin
- Re: [IDNO-DISCUSS] Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpos... Kent Crispin
- Re: [IDNO-DISCUSS] Re: [IFWP] Why fail on pu... Jay Fenello
- Re: [IDNO-DISCUSS] Re: [IFWP] Why fail o... Michael Sondow
- Re: [IDNO-DISCUSS] Re: [IFWP] Why fail on pu... Joop Teernstra
- Re: [IDNO-DISCUSS] Re: [IFWP] Why fail o... Gene Marsh
- Re: [IDNO-DISCUSS] Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpos... Joop Teernstra
- Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpose Eric Weisberg
- Re[2]: [IFWP] Why fail on purpose William X. Walsh
- Re: [IDNO-DISCUSS] Re[2]: [IFWP] Why fail on purpose Joop Teernstra
- Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpose Karl Auerbach
- Re: [IDNO-DISCUSS] Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpose Joop Teernstra
- Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpose Michael Sondow
- Re: [IDNO-DISCUSS] Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpose Jay Fenello
- Re: [IDNO-DISCUSS] Re: [IFWP] Why fail on purpose Joop Teernstra
