On 23 July 1999, Kent Crispin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Fri, Jul 23, 1999 at 04:32:58PM -0700, Bill Lovell wrote: >> For the benefit of dumb butt here, what's the IP size of the new IPv6 thing? >> (Did I get that right?) It's not a "dotted quad," I take it, so what is >> it? And >> its capacity is 2 to the what? > >128 bits vs 32 bits for IPv4. That's > >340282366920938463463374607431768211456 >vs >4294967296 > >addresses, if I did the arithmetic correctly... > >Or 56713727820156410577229101238 addresses for every human on earth, >give or take a few. ...and ICANN will be enforcing a charge of what, per IP block? -- Mark C. Langston Let your voice be heard: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.idno.org Systems Admin http://www.icann.org San Jose, CA http://www.dnso.org
- Re: [IFWP] What I would have said... Richard J. Sexton
- Re: [IFWP] What I would have said... R . Gaetano
- Re: [IFWP] What I would have said... Martin Burack
- Re: [IDNO-DISCUSS] Re: [IFWP] What I would ... Karl Auerbach
- Re: [IDNO-DISCUSS] Re: [IFWP] What I wo... Jeff Williams
- Re: [IDNO-DISCUSS] Re: [IFWP] What I wo... Bill Lovell
- Re: [IDNO-DISCUSS] Re: [IFWP] What... Kent Crispin
- Re: [IDNO-DISCUSS] Re: [IFWP] ... Karl Auerbach
- Re: [IDNO-DISCUSS] Re: [IFWP] ... Mark C. Langston
- Re: [IDNO-DISCUSS] Re: [IF... Jeff Williams
- Re: [IDNO-DISCUSS] Re: [IFWP] ... Bill Lovell
- Re: [IDNO-DISCUSS] Re: [IFWP] What I would ... Joop Teernstra
- Re: [IFWP] What I would have said... Gordon Cook
- Re: [IFWP] What I would have said... Jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] What I would have said... Jim Dixon
- Re: [IFWP] What I would have said... Bill Lovell
- Re: [IFWP] What I would have said... Jeff Williams
- [IFWP] Analogical thought Mark Measday
- Re: [IFWP] Analogical thought Greg Skinner
