At 05:17 PM 7/23/99 -0700, you wrote: >On Fri, Jul 23, 1999 at 04:32:58PM -0700, Bill Lovell wrote: >> For the benefit of dumb butt here, what's the IP size of the new IPv6 thing? >> (Did I get that right?) It's not a "dotted quad," I take it, so what is >> it? And >> its capacity is 2 to the what? > >128 bits vs 32 bits for IPv4. That's > >340282366920938463463374607431768211456 >vs >4294967296 > >addresses, if I did the arithmetic correctly... > >Or 56713727820156410577229101238 addresses for every human on earth, >give or take a few. > You guys are good! I was actually asking the size of the address not only to determine how many there would be, but also, for computer manipulation purposes, the actual word size, and the number 128 answers that. Thanks. (Um, my calculator won't take that many digits.) Bill Lovell >-- >Kent Crispin "Do good, and you'll be >[EMAIL PROTECTED] lonesome." -- Mark Twain >
- Re: [IFWP] What I would have said... Richard J. Sexton
- Re: [IFWP] What I would have said... R . Gaetano
- Re: [IFWP] What I would have said... Martin Burack
- Re: [IDNO-DISCUSS] Re: [IFWP] What I would ... Karl Auerbach
- Re: [IDNO-DISCUSS] Re: [IFWP] What I wo... Jeff Williams
- Re: [IDNO-DISCUSS] Re: [IFWP] What I wo... Bill Lovell
- Re: [IDNO-DISCUSS] Re: [IFWP] What... Kent Crispin
- Re: [IDNO-DISCUSS] Re: [IFWP] ... Karl Auerbach
- Re: [IDNO-DISCUSS] Re: [IFWP] ... Mark C. Langston
- Re: [IDNO-DISCUSS] Re: [IF... Jeff Williams
- Re: [IDNO-DISCUSS] Re: [IFWP] ... Bill Lovell
- Re: [IDNO-DISCUSS] Re: [IFWP] What I would ... Joop Teernstra
- Re: [IFWP] What I would have said... Gordon Cook
- Re: [IFWP] What I would have said... Jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] What I would have said... Jim Dixon
- Re: [IFWP] What I would have said... Bill Lovell
- Re: [IFWP] What I would have said... Jeff Williams
- [IFWP] Analogical thought Mark Measday
- Re: [IFWP] Analogical thought Greg Skinner
- Re: [IFWP] Analogical thought Jay Fenello
- Re: [IFWP] Analogical thought Jim Dixon
