Re: [IDNO-DISCUSS] Re: [IFWP] What I would have said...

[Greg Skinner]

"Richard J. Sexton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> So what makes more sense. One monolithic address registry
> which is a monopoly and a single point of failure,
> or 2048 registries, any one of which can give you an address
> you can use?

Why do you assume that just because I don't advocate TLD authorities
(whatever THAT means) being IP address registries, that I am in
favor of a monopoly (ARIN) doing it?  Why don't you just take my
comments at face value?  I believe that there should be coordination
between business, government, military, private citizens, etc. in the
administration of IP addresses.

--gregbo