Re: [IDNO-DISCUSS] RE: [IFWP] The rough consensus in Berlin and ICANN's bylaws

[Joop Teernstra]

At 01:59 PM 9/08/1999 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

>The subject of the testbed, and the poor management thereof by NSI,
>triggered again the debate on the gTLD Constituency. I believe that it was
>George Conrades to mention that, if NSI was not willing to autolimit their
>participation to the Council to one representative, the Board would have
>changed the bylaws to ensure that the spirit of the "one person max. per
>organization" would have been applied.
>There was a considerable expression of satisfaction (applause), that I would
>have called consensus.
>
Thanks for aiding my memory, Roberto. 
But if applause indicates consensus, then we also have consensus on
admitting the IDNO constituency to the DNSO.


--Joop Teernstra LL.M.--  , bootstrap  of
the Cyberspace Association,
the constituency for Individual Domain Name Owners
http://www.idno.org