Sunday, August 22, 1999, 5:19:19 PM, Planet Communications Computing Facility <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Your points are of interest, but don't alter my consideration. The issues > have already been debated under US law and the appropriate acts to > maintain those rights to privacy are already in force. I would disagree strongly with your interpretation of this. They are not as far sweeping or all inclusive to cover every area, and indeed they do not apply here. Anarchy should NOT be the rule. -- William X. Walsh - DSo Internet Services Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax:(209) 671-7934 Editor of http://www.dnspolicy.com/ (IDNO MEMBER) Support the Cyberspace Association, the constituency of Individual Domain Name Owners http://www.idno.org
[IFWP] Re[6]: [IDNO-DISCUSS] icann.edleman.19990819 / Access to ICANN Santiago real video feed (fwd)
- [IFWP] Re[2]: [IDNO-DISCUSS] ican... William X. Walsh
- Re: [IFWP] Re[2]: [IDNO-DISC... Jeff Williams
- Re[2]: [IFWP] Re[2]: [ID... William X. Walsh
- Re: [IFWP] Re[2]: [I... Jeff Williams
- [IFWP] Re: Re[2]: [IDNO-DISC... Planet Communications Computing Facility
- [IFWP] Re[4]: [IDNO-DISC... William X. Walsh
- [IFWP] Re: Re[4]: [I... Planet Communications Computing Facility
- [IFWP] Re: Re[6]... William X. Walsh
- [IFWP] Re: ... Planet Communications Computing Facility
- Re: [IFWP] ... Jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Re[4]: [I... Jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Re[2]: [I... Ellen Rony
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Re[2]... Planet Communications Computing Facility
- Re: [IFWP] Re: R... Jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Re: R... Ellen Rony
- Re: [IFWP] ... Planet Communications Computing Facility
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Re[2]... Patrick Greenwell
- Re: [IFWP] Re: R... Jeff Williams
