At 10:55 AM 11/24/99 , you wrote: >I did not conclude that all is lost, so long as I see some progress. The >alternatives scare me too. So that is where we disagree. Hi Tamar, What progress have you seen? A larger board? What realistic alternatives do you fear? Consider that the whole big Internet world out there exists...and has long successfully existed...marvelously well without an ICANN. The fact of the matter is that any organization constructed like ICANN - where every interest and constituency is simply grafted on to create an unfathomable labyrinth - is unlikely to succeed in any field. Indeed, for most interested parties, a "good ICANN" is one that does nothing or disappears. About the only exception, is the introduction of new TLDs. Some discussion of these matters would be useful. cordially, tony
- [IFWP] Representations to WTO Conference in Seattle next ... Mark R Measday
- Re: [IFWP] Representations to WTO Conference in Seat... Jay Fenello
- Re: [IFWP] Representations to WTO Conference in Seat... Esther Dyson
- Re: [IFWP] Representations to WTO Conference in ... Mark R Measday
- Re: [IFWP] Representations to WTO Conference... Jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Representations to WTO Conference in ... Gordon Cook
- Dyson's reply RE: [IFWP] Representations to WTO ... Ken Freed
- Re: Dyson's reply RE: [IFWP] Representations... Tamar Frankel
- Re: Dyson's reply RE: [IFWP] Representat... Gordon Cook
- Re: Dyson's reply RE: [IFWP] Repres... Tamar Frankel
- Re: Dyson's reply RE: [IFWP] Re... A.M. Rutkowski
- Re: Dyson's reply RE: [IFWP... Jeff Williams
- Re: Dyson's reply RE: [IFWP] Re... Gordon Cook
- [IFWP] 'Mortgages' for domain n... Andy Oram
- Re: [IFWP] 'Mortgages' for ... Jeff Williams
- Re: Re: [IFWP] Representations to WTO Conference in ... Javier Rodriguez
