I just laughed when I read this, and some people may like it because it shows a trend toward considering domain names to be owned by domain name holders. But I fear it will reinforce the idea that you and your domain name are "bescherrt" (i.e., there is one domain name divinely chosen for you) and increase the frenzy over names that two different parties want. Andy --- http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/sci/tech/newsid_533000/533455.stm
- Re: [IFWP] Representations to WTO Conference in Seat... Mark R Measday
- Re: [IFWP] Representations to WTO Conference in ... Jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Representations to WTO Conference in Seat... Gordon Cook
- Dyson's reply RE: [IFWP] Representations to WTO Conf... Ken Freed
- Re: Dyson's reply RE: [IFWP] Representations to ... Tamar Frankel
- Re: Dyson's reply RE: [IFWP] Representations... Gordon Cook
- Re: Dyson's reply RE: [IFWP] Representat... Tamar Frankel
- Re: Dyson's reply RE: [IFWP] Repres... A.M. Rutkowski
- Re: Dyson's reply RE: [IFWP] Re... Jeff Williams
- Re: Dyson's reply RE: [IFWP] Repres... Gordon Cook
- Re: [IFWP] 'Mortgages' for domain n... Andy Oram
- Re: [IFWP] 'Mortgages' for doma... Jeff Williams
- Re: Re: [IFWP] Representations to WTO Conference in Seatt... Javier Rodriguez
