Tony and all,
A.M. Rutkowski wrote:
> At 10:55 AM 11/24/99 , you wrote:
> >I did not conclude that all is lost, so long as I see some progress. The
> >alternatives scare me too. So that is where we disagree.
>
> Hi Tamar,
>
> What progress have you seen?
> A larger board?
Not to mention a Board that was illegitimately elected, and
is still unaccountable. I wouldn't call that progress. I would call
is something very different...
>
>
> What realistic alternatives do you fear?
> Consider that the whole big Internet world
> out there exists...and has long successfully
> existed...marvelously well without an ICANN.
Yes it has, even with it's various warts.
>
>
> The fact of the matter is that any organization
> constructed like ICANN - where every interest and
> constituency is simply grafted on to create an
> unfathomable labyrinth - is unlikely to succeed
> in any field. Indeed, for most interested
> parties, a "good ICANN" is one that does nothing
> or disappears. About the only exception, is the
> introduction of new TLDs.
Well stated here Tony, and quite right.
>
>
> Some discussion of these matters would be useful.
>
> cordially,
> tony
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman INEGroup (Over 95k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Contact Number: 972-447-1894
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
