I must go, but will return in a few days and we can continue the
discussion. Thanks for responding.
Tamar
At 01:22 PM 11/24/99 -0800, you wrote:
>Richard and all,
>
>Richard J. Sexton wrote:
>
>> >>I did not conclude that all is lost, so long as I see some progress. The
>> >>alternatives scare me too. So that is where we disagree.
>> >
>> >Hi Tamar,
>> >
>> >What progress have you seen?
>> >A larger board?
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> >Some discussion of these matters would be useful.
>>
>> Whayt he said. Along with:
>>
>> 1) If ICANN doesn't suceed the ITU will take over
>> 2) The stability of the net depends on ICANNs success
>> 3) Without ICANN there will be no e-commerce.
>
> And all of these are utter myths and/or scare tactics that some
>ICANN apologists have floated during this process. To me,
>this is and has always been pure folly or overly exaggerated.
>
>>
>>
>> --
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> ** The US has the best government money can buy **
>
>Regards,
>
>--
>Jeffrey A. Williams
>Spokesman INEGroup (Over 95k members strong!)
>CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
>Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
>E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Contact Number: 972-447-1894
>Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
>
>
>
>
>
