Joop, it's not fair to quote out of context. I appreciate your arguments, but
this was originally in response to a thread concerning the WTO and ICANN's
engagement with that organization. Esther Dyson was commenting on the mess the
WTO is, I think, not making statements concerning theoretical global democracy
However the multilateral/bilateral thing is very confusing.

Joop Teernstra wrote:

> Esther wrote:
>
>  >>It is not governing
> > >the world, and god forbid *anything* should be put to a global vote.
>
> Esther,
>
> I do not want to read or understand this statement out of context, as I
> think I understand what you were thinking of when you wrote that (world
> government is abhorrent, whether democratic or not)  but since I have been
> striving very hard in the last few years to make putting things to a global
> vote a possiblity (for special interest organizations), may I invite you to
> modify that statement?
>
> How about the  global vote for ICANN AL-members?
> How about a global vote electing representatives or spokesmen for
> stakeholders of very special interests, such as Domain Name Owners?
> How about a global vote ratifying the bylaws/rules of an organization such
> as the Cyberspace Association or --perish the thought<g> -- ICANN?
>
> --joop teernstra, IDNO bootstrap
>
> --Make good use of any voting rights and opportunities--
> http://www.democracy.org.nz/vote1/
begin:vcard 
n:Measday;Mark
tel;cell:0044370947420
tel;fax:0033450209492
tel;work:0033450209492
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
url:http://www.josmarian.ch
org:Josmarian SA
version:2.1
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Director
adr;quoted-printable:;;pa Reich & Zen-Ruffinen=0D=0A72 bd St Georges=0D=0A=0D=0A;Geneva;;CH-1205;Switzerland
fn:Mark Measday
end:vcard

Reply via email to