Bill and all,
Bill Gerrard wrote:
> > William Walsh earlier ponderd the idea that I was on a camapine against
> > Register.com. I am not of course. But blatent examples of their
> questionable
> > abilities and practices are very evident. For instance:
> >
> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/WPlate/1999-12/21/113l-122199-idx.html
> >
> > provides for just one sort of "Screw-up" that Register.com seems to be
> > plage it's registrants with.
>
> Sounds like the NSI Registry is to blame there... Why would register.com be
> responsible for keeping the NSI registry database up and running?
They aren't. Nor is that an issue here. So I fail to see your point really.
Register.com, is responsible for keeping track of any and all registrations
and decided to use the ICANN sponsored SRS registration system when months
ago the were warned of its problems. Hence they know these sorts of exposures
were indeed likely to happen. This too they were also warned of as well.
So, they took advantage of a situation that the original registrant had called
and sent register.com E-Mail about, and secondly violated their ICANN
determined (Edicted) Registrar accreditation agreement.
>
>
> > Another example is:
> > http://slashdot.org/articles/99/12/11/1155244.shtml
> >
> > Need I say more..
>
> The NSI Registrar is the one that released the domain name. How could
> register.com be responsible for that?
Because Register.com knew in advance that tit was released and a mistake
had taken place, and again took unfair and "Stole" the Domain Name from it's
rightful original registrant.
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman INEGroup (Over 95k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Contact Number: 972-447-1894
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
