>Which is why we need laws governing the DNS, not committees.
>-- ken
>
>P.S. Richard: Your address: ("Richard J. Sexton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
> always bounces as "undeliverable", if that info is helpful to you.
you simply DO NOT UNDERSTAND ken.......
although I admitt I didn't fully understand until I called steff
voice a couple of hours ago and asked him to explain the TCP function
as a tust mechanism for IP.
laws shmaws...... the bloody hell with laws...... yes in grade
school they taught us that laws were good....but any gd laws in any
gd legilature are gonna be the laws the control freaks o the icann ip
police want........
so don't talk laws.,...... you are wasting all our time...... the
only way end to end can work is if the ends can trust each
other.........
if someone has enough money to sue department of commerce over icann
let them do so!!!!! If no one steps up to the plate then turn to
trust issues and start DEALING with rewality
by the way if you throw out the ICANN roots from your dns
and use the following ip addresses for your name server
204.80.125.130
204.57.55.100
199.166.24.1
richard sextons non standard dns works fine
ARGH!!!! i have used these for about 2 years 7 by 24
--
****************************************************************
The COOK Report on Internet, 431 Greenway Ave, Ewing, NJ 08618 USA
(609) 882-2572 (phone & fax) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Index to 9 years
of the COOK Report at http://cookreport.com From now
through Sept 15th
half price sale on university library site license and access to ALL
back issues.
Site license $575 and all back issues $300. http://cookreport.com/sale.shtml
****************************************************************
