At 04:36 PM 9/9/01 +0200, you wrote:
>On Sat, 8 Sep 2001, at 16:01 [=GMT-0400], Richard J. Sexton wrote:
>
>> I agree with Gordon on this; we don't need "gevernance". We didn't have any
>> to build the network and it's generally harder to build somehing than run it.
>
>That would be great. However, if you own a piece of land in my country
>and build a house on it, the local government will pull it down, and
>send you a bill for the costs of descrtuction, unless you had its
>permission to build it. Of course we will not get that permission.
Sure, they have a right under law to do so. No such law exists concerning the
Internet.
--
"But at the end of the day, even if you put a calico dress on
it and call it Florence, a pig is still a pig."
-- Bradshaw v. Unity Marine Corp. et al., 2001 U.S. Dist.
LEXIS 8962, (S. D. Tex., 2001).
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- [IFWP] The emperor is still naked Ken Freed
- Re: [IFWP] The emperor is still naked Einar Stefferud
- Re: [IFWP] The emperor is still naked Michael Sondow
- Re: [IFWP] The emperor is still naked Ken Freed
- Re: [IFWP] The emperor is still naked Gordon Cook
- Re: [IFWP] The emperor is still naked Richard J. Sexton
- Re: [IFWP] The emperor is still naked Jay Fenello
- Re: [IFWP] The emperor is still naked Ken Freed
- Re: [IFWP] The emperor is still naked Marc Schneiders
- Re: [IFWP] The emperor is still naked Richard J. Sexton
- Re: [IFWP] The emperor is still naked Einar Stefferud
- Re: [IFWP] The emperor is still naked Einar Stefferud
- Re: [IFWP] The emperor is still naked Marc Schneiders
- Re: [IFWP] The emperor is still naked Ken Freed
- Re: [IFWP] The emperor is still naked Gordon Cook
- Re: [IFWP] The emperor is still naked Ken Freed
- Re: [IFWP] The emperor is still naked Gordon Cook
- Re: [IFWP] The emperor is still naked Einar Stefferud
- Re: [IFWP] The emperor is still naked Ken Freed
- Re: [IFWP] The emperor is still naked Gordon Cook
