Derek: I hate to say this ... but Reactor may be a dying a breed let alone it folds under pressure. Take a look at Transfer (www.transfer-orm.com). It is an ORM as well, but more efficient and supposedly better under load than Reactor. We used Reactor for a project last year and had issues with load so we scrapped it before we went to production. Transfer supposedly addresses these issues and goes further. I have not used it yet, but saw an interesting demo of it at cfObjective() two weeks ago. I think Dave Shuck even did a preso using it at last weeks meeting. Dave S.: What is your experience with Reactor vs. Transfer? -JSLucido
_____ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of derek bumpas Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 11:28 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [DFW CFUG] Reactor Question I've been spending a lot of time with Doug Hughes's reactor and am loving it. I do have a quick question for you guys: Is there anyway to tell reactor to ignore a database column. I have a MySQL timestamp field that is set to update on changes by MySQL. When using the Reactor objects, Reactor by default sets these to null (I'm not setting a value.) Any ideas? Thanks, Derek
_______________________________________________ Reply to DFWCFUG: [email protected] Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists1.safesecureweb.com/mailman/listinfo/list List Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/list%40list.dfwcfug.org/ http://www.mail-archive.com/list%40dfwcfug.org/ DFWCFUG Sponsors: www.instantspot.com/ www.teksystems.com/
