Jeff,

 

I have heard the comments before about there being memory issues etc. with
Reactor, but I have never experienced them myself in the past.  I am now
working with Doug Hughes at Alagad and we were talking about this as he was
having performance issues with an application using Reactor.  The issues
were bad enough that he brought in Mike Brunt (WebApper, CF performance
testing extraordinaire) to do a bunch of performance tests on Reactor and
this application.  It turned out that there were no issues in Reactor at all
and that the performance issues were related to another piece of code.  So,
while I don't know if it is ever possible to say any tool or framework is
bug free, it has not been our experience that there were any performance
issues that were Reactor's doing.

 

-- Jeff Chastain

 

Alagad, Inc.

 

 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Jeff Lucido
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 2:18 PM
To: 'Dallas/Fort Worth ColdFusion User Group Mailing List'
Subject: RE: [DFW CFUG] Reactor Question

 

Derek:

 

I hate to say this ... but Reactor may be a dying a breed let alone it folds
under pressure. Take a look at Transfer (www.transfer-orm.com). It is an ORM
as well, but more efficient and supposedly better under load than Reactor.
We used Reactor for a project last year and had issues with load so we
scrapped it before we went to production. Transfer supposedly addresses
these issues and goes further. I have not used it yet, but saw an
interesting demo of it at cfObjective() two weeks ago. I think Dave Shuck
even did a preso using it at last weeks meeting. Dave S.: What is your
experience with Reactor vs. Transfer?

 

-JSLucido

 

  _____  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of derek bumpas
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 11:28 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [DFW CFUG] Reactor Question

I've been spending a lot of time with Doug Hughes's reactor and am loving
it.

I do have a quick question for you guys:

Is there anyway to tell reactor to ignore a database column.  I have a MySQL
timestamp field that is set to update on changes by MySQL.  When using the
Reactor objects, Reactor by default sets these to null (I'm not setting a
value.) 

Any ideas?

Thanks,
Derek

_______________________________________________
Reply to DFWCFUG: 
  [email protected]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe: 
  http://lists1.safesecureweb.com/mailman/listinfo/list
List Archives: 
    http://www.mail-archive.com/list%40list.dfwcfug.org/             
  http://www.mail-archive.com/list%40dfwcfug.org/
DFWCFUG Sponsors: 
  www.instantspot.com/
  www.teksystems.com/

Reply via email to