Am 19.10.2011 um 19:20 schrieb "Ståle Johnsen" 
<<mailto:[email protected]>[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>:

Hi and thanks for your reply.
It isn't a problem building the ipsec connection itself, but the destination 
end has a business requirement to not route other private adresses into their 
network, just public adresses. But as I understand this is not possible with 
pfsense? Here is some documentation about the subject with cisco: 
<http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk583/tk372/technologies_configuration_example09186a0080094634.shtml>
 
<http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk583/tk372/technologies_configuration_example09186a0080094634.shtml>
 
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk583/tk372/technologies_configuration_example09186a0080094634.shtml



Hi,

I think you need a second pfsense box. One for the NAT between your private 
subnet and public IPs and a second for the vpn.

                     NAT
                      |
Private --> pfsense --> public --> pfsense --> vpn

Bf
_______________________________________________
List mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list

Reply via email to