Hi,

> ----------------------------------------
> From: Adam Thompson <[email protected]>
> Sent: Fri May 11 22:51:08 NCT 2012
> To: 'jerome alet' <[email protected]>, 'pfSense support and discussion' 
> <[email protected]>
> Subject: RE: [pfSense] 2 LANs and time based limits
> 
> QoS on ADSL is notoriously difficult, and does not usually work quite as 
> expected.  There are implementation issues to blame, as well as a 
> theoretical/logical problem.

I understand (thanks to your explanations) but what I was thinking was not 
playing with the WAN side of the pipe which is shared, but with the interfaces 
between pfSense and the two sets of clients, which are not ADSL but traditional 
Ethernet links.

What I'm in doubt about now, is where to put the limiter rule ?

Should the limiter be seen by me as a way to guarantee bandwidth, in which case 
I should set it high an apply it on the classrooms interface, or should it be 
seen by me as a bandwidh limiter, in which case I set it low and apply it on 
the appartments interface ?

> When you configure your system as described, you will rarely - if ever - 
> get exactly the results you expected.  Aim for "good enough", instead of 
> "perfect" and you will likely succeed.

good enough is good enough for us : up until now there was only a single ADSL 
line for each set of clients, needless to say students will be happy whatever 
the solution.

right now there's no limiter in use, so they ENJOY pfSense ;-)

thanks for your help.

-- 
Jerome Alet
_______________________________________________
List mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list

Reply via email to